The three people I had evaluate my leadership reputation and I all agreed that I have the following characteristics: intelligent, skilled, sensitive to others needs, respectful to authority, disciplined, hard working, trustworthy, happy, considerate, supports colleagues, knowledgeable, empathetic, appreciative, appropriately dressed for work, competent, someone with a positive outlook on life, approachable, well prepared to meet my duties, likable, loving, pleasant
These characteristics are very representative of my strengths. Empathy is marked directly. Achiever is implied by hard working and disciplined. Harmony is implied by considerate, pleasant, and likable. Learner is implied by intelligent and knowledgeable. Responsible was checked directly by me and two of the others.
The first two people I had evaluate me were my mom and my boyfriend, so they are people who know me extremely well. I thought it would be interesting to ask a friend that doesn’t know me so deeply to see what the majority of people think of me. For the most part his check marks agreed with mine or at least one of the other’s, though he did miss a few that everyone else checked: admits when wrong, secure in my identity, responsible, a positive role-model, and effective in written communication
Another important thing to look at is which ones everyone except me checked: Someone who takes feedback well, a quality contributor, good on giving praise, humble, organized, and conversationally competent
From this activity, I have learned that I am pretty hard on myself. I don’t feel like I’m very good in conversation, I should definitely give more praise, and I don’t contribute much so I don’t feel like a quality contributor. Everyone else thought I was good in these categories. How I take feedback really depends on who it’s from and what it’s about. If it’s negative feedback, I typically feel very bad for the fact that I did something wrong, and I dwell on it and am upset with myself. I always make an effort to fix my behaviors though. In other instances, like if I know I messed up, I accept the criticism and do better without getting upset about it. This exercise confirmed a lot of what I already thought about myself, and showed me that I am better at conversation and my input is more important than I originally thought.
I really enjoy evaluating myself. I am constantly reflecting on what I’m doing well, what I could be doing better, and why I’m feeling the way I am. Receiving this feedback was pretty easy because no one checked anything negative except consistently tardy, which I am well aware of. It was interesting to see how others’ answers compared to mine. They were fairly consistent throughout. There were not any that only I marked; all of them had at least one other in common. I like this because it means that others see me how I see myself, which boosts my confidence a little bit and makes me feel more connected to others.
These characteristics are very representative of my strengths. Empathy is marked directly. Achiever is implied by hard working and disciplined. Harmony is implied by considerate, pleasant, and likable. Learner is implied by intelligent and knowledgeable. Responsible was checked directly by me and two of the others.
The first two people I had evaluate me were my mom and my boyfriend, so they are people who know me extremely well. I thought it would be interesting to ask a friend that doesn’t know me so deeply to see what the majority of people think of me. For the most part his check marks agreed with mine or at least one of the other’s, though he did miss a few that everyone else checked: admits when wrong, secure in my identity, responsible, a positive role-model, and effective in written communication
Another important thing to look at is which ones everyone except me checked: Someone who takes feedback well, a quality contributor, good on giving praise, humble, organized, and conversationally competent
From this activity, I have learned that I am pretty hard on myself. I don’t feel like I’m very good in conversation, I should definitely give more praise, and I don’t contribute much so I don’t feel like a quality contributor. Everyone else thought I was good in these categories. How I take feedback really depends on who it’s from and what it’s about. If it’s negative feedback, I typically feel very bad for the fact that I did something wrong, and I dwell on it and am upset with myself. I always make an effort to fix my behaviors though. In other instances, like if I know I messed up, I accept the criticism and do better without getting upset about it. This exercise confirmed a lot of what I already thought about myself, and showed me that I am better at conversation and my input is more important than I originally thought.
I really enjoy evaluating myself. I am constantly reflecting on what I’m doing well, what I could be doing better, and why I’m feeling the way I am. Receiving this feedback was pretty easy because no one checked anything negative except consistently tardy, which I am well aware of. It was interesting to see how others’ answers compared to mine. They were fairly consistent throughout. There were not any that only I marked; all of them had at least one other in common. I like this because it means that others see me how I see myself, which boosts my confidence a little bit and makes me feel more connected to others.